Yes, I can see how that would be... but I was cruising along thinking 210 when the "220" entered without introduction (aside from the discussion in the first few paragraphs way above).
It is a fine piece of work on the 210, regardless of my quibbling.
Re: 210 210 210 210 210 220 220....what?!!
Date: 2009-02-25 04:07 am (UTC)It is a fine piece of work on the 210, regardless of my quibbling.
Frog