"One has to defend a deontological position in a world of limited resources."
Why do you think one has to defend a dontological position in a world of limited resources?
"So whether one wishes it or not, one has to recourse to utilitarian methods. Which does not change the validity of the principle."
If the principle were valid, then why would one have to recourse tomethods that invalidates the principle, especially if one did not even wish to resort to the methods that invalidates the principle?
"Even morals is not a suicide pact."
Another word, "For the right price, everyone's a whore?"
"As to the hero worship, examples do not matter, they are simply a way of pandering — could you direct me to a theoretical work?"
Why do you state that examples do not matter?
You think people should not pander to MLK?
"We live in a society subscribing to liberal principles, it does not mean we live in a liberal society."
I would qualify that by exchanging, 'does not mean' with 'does not necessarily mean'.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-18 02:19 pm (UTC)Why do you think one has to defend a dontological position in a world of limited resources?
"So whether one wishes it or not, one has to recourse to utilitarian methods. Which does not change the validity of the principle."
If the principle were valid, then why would one have to recourse tomethods that invalidates the principle, especially if one did not even wish to resort to the methods that invalidates the principle?
"Even morals is not a suicide pact."
Another word, "For the right price, everyone's a whore?"
"As to the hero worship, examples do not matter, they are simply a way of pandering — could you direct me to a theoretical work?"
Why do you state that examples do not matter?
You think people should not pander to MLK?
"We live in a society subscribing to liberal principles, it does not mean we live in a liberal society."
I would qualify that by exchanging, 'does not mean' with 'does not necessarily mean'.