disraelia

[larvatus]

Walter Laqueur serves up a stunning venture into counterfactual history. Although its premiss stands at odds with the analysis of imperial decay through ethnic strife by the founder of its genre, Laqueur’s narrative supports the underlying program of construing plausibility as the basis for understanding causation in history and political science. Curiously enough, for all current reaction to its conclusions, no one appears to have drawn a parallel with Tony Judt’s muchly maligned advocacy of Israel’s conversion into a binational and secular state. The take-away lesson is that bitter pills are better savored in wistful hindsight than grim foreboding.

Comments

[sensanome.livejournal.com]

too bad almost nobody actually gives a flying fuck about making things better. instead they just keep writing these books in hopes of making money, which is kind of similar to swiss bankers' conduct during WWII.

[larvatus.livejournal.com]

I don’t think Walter Laqueur is in it for the money.